Paradoxes of the logical implication
When one starts studying logic one is likely to be surprised by the workings of the so-called material implication, p –> q (if p, then q). Unlike the implication used in natural language, which can for example indicate causation, the material implication has a more restricted meaning. The material implication is true unless p is true and q is false. This is ultimately a matter of definition to resolve ambiguities present in natural language.
See archives for more ...
↬ For later reference, if I ever consider self-hosting a mailing service.
Filosoof Ton Lemaire leeft radicaal eenvoudig
↬ ‘Op deze aarde is geen onschuldig verblijf mogelijk’